Comments on: Google Chrome v/s Mozilla FireFox – Comparing Web 2.0 Performance

By: Souvik Roy

Souvik Roy — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:47:19 +0000

I’m very skeptic about the results. What it seemed to me is that gmail was in chrome’s cache and not in firefox’s cache. I’ve tested both chrome n firefox myself, though chrome is both faster and lighter, the results like (compose mail loading time for firefox = 9sec) simply goes above my head. In fact after gmail loads *completely* the compose mail can be loaded even after the net is disconnected (instantaneously!). But I totally agree with the pointers mentioned later. Also I do not like the fact that Chrome uses IE’s engine in the background.I think google developers should develop their own rendering engine
Kudos 2 all,
Souvik

By: FLu!D

FLu!D — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:20:00 +0000

@ Anish : Yea.. Google still supports Firefox . The primary target is of course IE.

By: Anish K.S

Anish K.S — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:55:37 +0000

I think Chrome aiming IE not Firefox.

By: Tanveer

Tanveer — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:07:53 +0000

I find google chrome a very useful and fast browser as comparing to internet explorer and firefox. One thing which I have noticed on my computer is that as I use internet explorer and firefox to explore web pages my windows slow down as I open more pages but using google chrome it doesn’t happened! my windows performance increased using google’s new browser CHROMEI LOVE IT!!